Contingency or Situational Leadership School of Thought

Contingency or Situational School The well-known theories for contingency and
situational leadership are the ones that accept differing leadership styles and adapt to the
situations or people involved.

Widely referred to as the Hersey-Blanchard situational leadership theory: there
is no single “best” style of leadership. Effective leadership is task-relevant, and the most
successful leaders are those who adapt their leadership style to maturity (“the capacity
to set high but attainable goals, willingness and ability to take responsibility for the task,
and relevant education and/or experience of an individual or a group for the task”) of the
individual or group they are attempting to lead or influence. Effective leadership varies,
not only with the person or group that is being influenced but also depends with the task, job,
or function that needs to be accomplished. The Hersey-Blanchard situational leadership
theory rests on two fundamental concepts: leadership style and the individual or group’s
maturity level.

 

Leadership has four tasks based on an employee’s maturity.
• Delegating The leader is still involved in decisions; however, the process and
responsibility have been passed to the individual or group. The leader stays
involved to monitor progress.
• Participating This is where shared decision-making with the work group about
how a task is accomplished takes place; the leader is providing less task direction
while maintaining high relationship behavior with the group.
• Selling While the leader is still providing the direction, the leader is now using
two-way communication and providing the socioemotional support that will
allow the individual or group being influenced to buy into the process.
• Telling Characterized by one-way communication in which the leader defines
the roles of the individual or group and provides the what, how, why, when, and
where to do the task.

The most popular situational contingency theory was developed by Fred Fiedler.

The Fiedler contingency theory holds that group effectiveness depends on an appropriate
match between a leader’s style (essentially a trait measure) and the demands of the
situation. Fiedler considers situational control the extent to which a leader can determine
what their group is going to do to be the primary contingency factor in determining the
effectiveness of leader behavior.

Fiedler’s contingency model is a dynamic model where the personal characteristics
and motivation of the leader are said to interact with the current situation that the group
faces. Thus, the contingency model marks a shift away from the tendency to attribute
leadership effectiveness to personality alone.

Fiedler asserts that there are three factors determining the favorableness of the environment
for the leader.

      • Leader-member relations The degrees of trust, confidence, and respect that
        employees have in their leader
      • Task structure The extent to which the tasks the employees are engaged in are
        defined (clear or ambiguous, structured or unstructured)
      • Position power The degree of power and influence the leader has over their
        subordinates

Changing one of the three factors is a more effective route rather than trying to change
the leadership’s trait.

Tags
Sharam Kohan
Sharam Kohan

Sharam Kohan: Biography

Sharam Kohan is a seasoned professional with an extensive background in law, human relations, and organizational leadership. Currently a degree candidate for an LLM at UC Berkeley Law, Sharam brings a unique blend of legal education, hands-on experience, and a deep commitment to social justice and human rights.

With a career that spans diverse sectors, Sharam's expertise extends far beyond the classroom. He has served as a Human Relations Commissioner, contributing his leadership to Alameda County’s Human Relations Commission, where he worked on initiatives to improve community relations and promote equity. His dedication to social change is also evident in his philanthropic efforts as a donor to organizations like FACES SF, which provides vital resources and support to the Bay Area’s underserved communities.

An advocate for labor and employment rights, Sharam holds a specialization in Employment Law from Temple University School of Law, which has furthered his ability to navigate complex legal frameworks. His professional journey includes leadership roles across human resources and operations, where he has honed his ability to manage teams, shape organizational culture, and implement effective strategies that drive success. He also holds SHRM certification, further solidifying his expertise in human resources management.

As a writer and thought leader, Sharam has authored multiple works that delve into complex philosophical and legal topics. His books, Judgment, a Priori Itself and Sartre’s Conception of Freedom, explore the intersections of law, philosophy, and human freedom, blending his academic background with a passion for intellectual inquiry. These works have garnered attention for their thoughtful analysis and exploration of complex ideas, establishing Sharam as a respected voice in both legal and philosophical circles.

Though not a traditional legal scholar, Sharam’s interdisciplinary approach to understanding law and society has made him a sought-after commentator on topics ranging from legal theory to organizational dynamics. His writing can be found on various platforms, including his blog at Harvard, where he shares insights on law, politics, and social issues.

Sharam Kohan is a dynamic and forward-thinking professional with the knowledge, experience, and passion to contribute meaningfully to the legal, social, and business landscapes.

For more on Sharam Kohan’s work, visit his blog at archive.blogs.harvard.edu/kohan and his author pages on Amazon, including Judgment, a Priori Itself and Sartre's Conception of Freedom.

Articles: 222

Related Posts