Favoring Feelings over Facts and Truths in Human Resources Affairs and Decision Making

In today’s fast-paced and competitive world, the pressure to perform and succeed can often lead individuals to prioritize their own comfort and well-being over the objective facts and truths that underpin successful decision-making. This tendency can be particularly dangerous in the context of management and human resources affairs, where decisions can have significant and long-lasting impacts on individuals and organizations alike.
One of the most significant dangers of giving preference to feeling good over facts or truths is that it can lead to a lack of accountability and transparency in decision-making. When individuals prioritize their own comfort over objective facts and data, they may be more likely to make decisions that are self-serving and do not align with the best interests of the organization or its employees. This can create a culture of mistrust and resentment, where employees feel that their concerns and needs are not being taken seriously, and where management is seen as more concerned with their own well-being than that of their employees.

Another danger of prioritizing feeling good over facts or truths is that it can lead to a lack of innovation and progress. When individuals are more concerned with maintaining the status quo and avoiding discomfort or conflict, they may be less likely to take risks, challenge assumptions, or pursue new ideas. This can stifle creativity and innovation within an organization, leading to a decline in competitiveness and relevance over time.

In the context of human resources affairs, giving preference to feeling good over facts or truths can have particularly negative consequences. For example, if a manager is more concerned with maintaining a positive working environment than with addressing issues of harassment or discrimination, they may be less likely to take appropriate action to address these problems. This can create a hostile work environment for affected employees, leading to low morale, high turnover, and potential legal liability for the organization.

Overall, while it is important to prioritize the well-being and comfort of employees, it is equally important to base decisions on objective facts and data. By doing so, managers and human resources professionals can ensure that their decisions are in the best interests of the organization and its employees, rather than just serving their own personal preferences or biases. This will lead to a more transparent, accountable, and innovative workplace, where employees feel valued and respected, and where the organization is better positioned to succeed in a rapidly changing world.

Tags
Sharam Kohan
Sharam Kohan

Sharam Kohan: Biography

Sharam Kohan is a seasoned professional with an extensive background in law, human relations, and organizational leadership. Currently a degree candidate for an LLM at UC Berkeley Law, Sharam brings a unique blend of legal education, hands-on experience, and a deep commitment to social justice and human rights.

With a career that spans diverse sectors, Sharam's expertise extends far beyond the classroom. He has served as a Human Relations Commissioner, contributing his leadership to Alameda County’s Human Relations Commission, where he worked on initiatives to improve community relations and promote equity. His dedication to social change is also evident in his philanthropic efforts as a donor to organizations like FACES SF, which provides vital resources and support to the Bay Area’s underserved communities.

An advocate for labor and employment rights, Sharam holds a specialization in Employment Law from Temple University School of Law, which has furthered his ability to navigate complex legal frameworks. His professional journey includes leadership roles across human resources and operations, where he has honed his ability to manage teams, shape organizational culture, and implement effective strategies that drive success. He also holds SHRM certification, further solidifying his expertise in human resources management.

As a writer and thought leader, Sharam has authored multiple works that delve into complex philosophical and legal topics. His books, Judgment, a Priori Itself and Sartre’s Conception of Freedom, explore the intersections of law, philosophy, and human freedom, blending his academic background with a passion for intellectual inquiry. These works have garnered attention for their thoughtful analysis and exploration of complex ideas, establishing Sharam as a respected voice in both legal and philosophical circles.

Though not a traditional legal scholar, Sharam’s interdisciplinary approach to understanding law and society has made him a sought-after commentator on topics ranging from legal theory to organizational dynamics. His writing can be found on various platforms, including his blog at Harvard, where he shares insights on law, politics, and social issues.

Sharam Kohan is a dynamic and forward-thinking professional with the knowledge, experience, and passion to contribute meaningfully to the legal, social, and business landscapes.

For more on Sharam Kohan’s work, visit his blog at archive.blogs.harvard.edu/kohan and his author pages on Amazon, including Judgment, a Priori Itself and Sartre's Conception of Freedom.

Articles: 222

Related Posts