Is it Ethical for Staff to Recruit and Onboard their Own Supervisors?

It is not uncommon for companies to have lower-ranking staff recruit and onboard their own supervisors. This practice may seem logical and efficient, but it raises questions about ethics and best practices in management and human resources. In this article, I will explore whether it’s appropriate for staff to recruit and onboard their own supervisors, and what steps companies can take to ensure a fair and transparent process.

The potential ethical concerns

The first concern with having staff recruit and onboard their own supervisors is the potential for bias. If an employee is responsible for hiring someone they will be supervised by, they may be more likely to favor candidates who are like them or who they have a personal connection with. This can lead to a lack of diversity and fairness in the hiring process, which can harm the company’s culture and reputation over time.

When higher-ups are absent from the hiring process, it can create a lack of oversight and accountability. If managers and supervisors are left to their own devices, there may be a risk of bias and favoritism in the hiring process. This can lead to a lack of diversity and talent in the organization, as well as resentment and mistrust among staff.

Additionally, it can be awkward for an applicant to go through a hiring process with someone they will be supervising. The power dynamic between the two can make the applicant feel uncomfortable or like they’re being evaluated unfairly. This can also lead to a lack of transparency in the hiring process, which can harm the company’s reputation and employee morale.

Lastly, having staff recruit and onboard their own supervisors can lead to conflicts of interest. If the new supervisor is beholden to the manager who hired them, they may be less likely to speak up about issues or problems in the workplace. This can lead to a lack of accountability and transparency, which can harm the company’s culture and bottom line.

How to ensure a fair and transparent process?

To avoid these ethical concerns, companies should take steps to ensure a fair and transparent hiring process, regardless of who is responsible for recruiting and onboarding new supervisors. Some of these steps may include:

1. Having clear guidelines and policies in place for the hiring process, including what criteria will be used to evaluate candidates and what steps will be taken to ensure fairness and objectivity.

2. Providing training and support for managers and other staff involved in the hiring process, to ensure they understand the importance of fairness, diversity, and transparency.

3. Involving multiple stakeholders in the hiring process, including higher-ranking staff, HR representatives, and even current employees who will be working with the new supervisor. This can help ensure a diversity of perspectives and prevent bias or conflicts of interest.

4. Providing feedback and follow-up to candidates who are not hired, to help them understand why they were not selected and what they can do to improve their chances in the future.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while it may be tempting for staff to recruit and onboard their own supervisors, it’s important to consider the potential ethical concerns and take steps to ensure a fair and transparent process. By following best practices and providing support and training for all staff involved in the hiring process, companies can ensure that they are attracting and retaining the best talent.

Sharam Kohan
Sharam Kohan

Sharam Kohan: Biography

Sharam Kohan is a seasoned professional with an extensive background in law, human relations, and organizational leadership. Currently a degree candidate for an LLM at UC Berkeley Law, Sharam brings a unique blend of legal education, hands-on experience, and a deep commitment to social justice and human rights.

With a career that spans diverse sectors, Sharam's expertise extends far beyond the classroom. He has served as a Human Relations Commissioner, contributing his leadership to Alameda County’s Human Relations Commission, where he worked on initiatives to improve community relations and promote equity. His dedication to social change is also evident in his philanthropic efforts as a donor to organizations like FACES SF, which provides vital resources and support to the Bay Area’s underserved communities.

An advocate for labor and employment rights, Sharam holds a specialization in Employment Law from Temple University School of Law, which has furthered his ability to navigate complex legal frameworks. His professional journey includes leadership roles across human resources and operations, where he has honed his ability to manage teams, shape organizational culture, and implement effective strategies that drive success. He also holds SHRM certification, further solidifying his expertise in human resources management.

As a writer and thought leader, Sharam has authored multiple works that delve into complex philosophical and legal topics. His books, Judgment, a Priori Itself and Sartre’s Conception of Freedom, explore the intersections of law, philosophy, and human freedom, blending his academic background with a passion for intellectual inquiry. These works have garnered attention for their thoughtful analysis and exploration of complex ideas, establishing Sharam as a respected voice in both legal and philosophical circles.

Though not a traditional legal scholar, Sharam’s interdisciplinary approach to understanding law and society has made him a sought-after commentator on topics ranging from legal theory to organizational dynamics. His writing can be found on various platforms, including his blog at Harvard, where he shares insights on law, politics, and social issues.

Sharam Kohan is a dynamic and forward-thinking professional with the knowledge, experience, and passion to contribute meaningfully to the legal, social, and business landscapes.

For more on Sharam Kohan’s work, visit his blog at archive.blogs.harvard.edu/kohan and his author pages on Amazon, including Judgment, a Priori Itself and Sartre's Conception of Freedom.

Articles: 222